Good work m8!
I'm diggin' the ribbon. This design works great, Jonathan. I have been trying to redesign both my corporate and personal site and having no success whatsoever. It is very tough to be your own client.
You have done it admirably...
Very, very nice.
A pleasure to read and look at, plus smooth functionality.
Yeah, a definite improvement, and that's what it's all about.
One quick note. I think the comment preview function is a bit confusing for oldtimers. For a second, I thought that I had already posted part of what I was writing (that has happened to me before, you know, accidentally hitting return or a mouse button).
wow, great redesign! i'm tempted to steal some bits here and there for my own blog ;)
Am I the only one afraid of the form that keeps following me around? :))
Great work as usual Jonathan. Btw, there seems to be an odd color of the font on the about page (on ff 1.5.0.7). Just in case you haven't noticed it...
Miha: Thanks for pointing that out. I've fixed up the about page. :)
You're a very wise man, Mr. Snook!
Excellent job - there's much I can learn from you.
Very nice and minimal. One thing I would lose is the Dreamhost banner in the footer, which kind of takes away from the minimalist look. Also any non single post page looks a little bare in the secondary column since there isn't a comment box there.
Great design, didn't follow any trends, used a 'banner' type theme with superior organization, colors and your already top notch content....you scored a 10 out of a 10!
I agree with dylan about the dreamhost banner maybe turn it grey and have the blue image as a rollover. or turn the blue green to match the site. bloody awsome design tho!! A+++
release your old theme!!!
It looks really brilliant, where do you get your inspiration? Would love to see a post about some of the sources.
Keep up the great work!
Ps. One thing I have noted is that - Sometimes, I don't don't know where it happens, it just flips over - your site kicks in on the previous dark (latest version) and in order to get back to the white; I have to find the style-cookie and kill it. Any idea why?
Anton: And there's much I can learn from you, too! I need more screencasts! :)
Dylan: Indeed the second column does end up looking a look empty if nothing is there. The question is, what do I replace it with? On the about page, I'm sure I could structure the content to accommodate but article pages where comments have been closed are a little more problematic. Since it does happen on just a few screens, I'll live with it until I can come up with something creative.
Dylan/twe4ked: The Dreamhost banner is in the footer so its impact is minimal. Plus, I like that it has a little more prominence. At least for the time being. There is some adjustments I still want to make to the footer which should mean the DH banner will stand out less.
twe4ked: I'm not sure if it makes sense to release it as it was really just a 3 column layout. Many of the elements were so specific to my site that I can't see it being all that practical for anybody else.
Alexander: I did hear the odd report of styles reverting back and forth at one point but now I don't even check the cookie so it should never happen. Has it happened in the past couple days?
As always, a lovely design (and more friendlier on the eyes this time around;).
It's good to see the continuation of the green colour scheme as well as your trademark comments form. I also really like the links section just before the comment area.
Nice work:)
I'm a frequent reader of the blog, and I do really like the redesign. I appreciate the fact that you didn't just make "green banners" but went ahead and put the wavy lines into them too. A+.
The only thing I've noticed is that your "ext.gif" should probably be transparent. If you look at the div#linkitup
below, you can start to see the background of the gif as it goes further down into the darker part of the gradient.
I'm really nitpicking here, but hey. Overall, awesome!
I agree with you completely when you say that being featured on a CSS showcase is not at all what Web design is about. These days, a CSS gallery is definitely not where the talent is. Wonderful job!
The layout is gorgeous! I am jealous ;)
I agree you're better off to steer away from the eye candy and bells and whistles. I would far rather pay repeat visits to a subtle, beautiful and functional site.
The DH banner doesn't bother me (I always like to see DH getting props), but since it's under discussion, it might integrate better if it were greyscale, and blue on rollover.
Oh, and I should mention that I just made some backend tweaks, mostly to the comments handling to prevent malicious code and improved the spam detection.
The spam detection has been working really well but there were many hitting moderation that I'd prefer to just junk. It's nice to have the flexibility to recognize a pattern and just add it to my spam component before it becomes a huge problem.
Despite its amazing look, I can't help but miss some sort of 'search' functionality. Also the (c) Jonathan Snook and the RSS Feed button look at bit out of place at the bottom
Really clean and crisp design. The green separators leaving the edge of the container do a really great job of clearly separating different content areas.
Have you considered integrating these further into your structure? Perhaps a good idea would be to use regular horizontal rules, each visually replaced with the green banner graphic? That way you still have the separation even without CSS.
Great work Jonathan :)
Cole: The copyright does look a little out of place because it's out of the grid. The RSS button is where it is because the 'design' I've been working off actually has another button beside it: a collapse button to be able to collapse the fat footer. Whether that button makes an actual appearance hasn't been decided yet. I suspect those elements will get revisited when I change how I handle RSS site wide.
Steve: The reason I haven't done that is because I don't want to overdo the effect. The layout was primarily focusing on clean lines. The banner actually got introduced near the end of the design process when I was playing with the triangle - a subtle element that was more prominent in an older design. As you can see, the tail simply has a triangle shape cut out of it and not a fancy, draping tail with multiple points.
I like this design alot better than the last one. The dark layout just didnt seem to fit into what i thought "www.avmdanse.com" was.
This layout kinda gets back to the feeling of www.avmdanse.com 2 layouts ago which is the one I think people (myself included) really fell in love with.
In my opinion, I think it would like neat to have that RSS a teeny bit smaller and build it into a another ribbon to end the page, and then the copyright could sit right on it as well...
I wasnt speaking of the visual design of the banner - which I think looks fantastic just as it is :). I was speaking about the behind the scenes integration of the banner into your site. Why not make the banner a horizontal rule in your markup, using CSS image replacement? Therefore even without CSS a content seperator is still displayed to visitors.
I used and wrote about this technique here.
Lately the problem haven't appeared so I think the problem might be gone.
Hi Jonathan, love the front page, very clear! It's been a pleasure seeing the design evolve over time!
About the second column being empty: on the about page, you could place your picture there. On posts with closed comments, you could place a gray or faded version of the "Place a comment"-container, strip out the functionality and highlight some "comments are disabled"-alike sentence in it.
Oh, also noticed that the "post a comment"-block has a 1px gap with the green line that divides your first&second column from the third one ... I think (just a hunch here) that it might look better without the gap?
wbr,
B!
Very nice. Subtle, elegant, readable.
You started me off on a hunt to see what hasLayout and zoom is and i spent a good hour and a half here: http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/onhavinglayout.html
I have a question for you, I was looking through your CSS and you've applied overflow: auto and zoom: 1 together. Why?
Also would this force hasLayout when all instances already have properties that force hasLayout, i.e a width and a height?
Is there something I'm missing?
the overflow:auto
is for containing floats. I use the zoom:1
for the same purpose but for IE.
Great job Jon! Well thought out. ;)
I said it elsewhere, but your site looks great! I really like the treatment of the comments you've made as opposed to readers'.
Congratulations... Wish you all the best...
Glad you kept this lovely floating comment box. That has to be my favorite feature of the design and one of the coolest blog comment boxes around.
I dig it. Clean. Lite. Simple. Good work. It's a great example of iterative reduction. Keep subtracting off features and fills that don't add huge value. Well Done.